Title
Tws summary
Trust
Year ▲
Viewable
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Louder, flashier, funnier than the predecessor, loaded with more ambitious set-pieces and a more self-parodying tone than even the first “Scream.” What “Scream 2” lacks, however, is the same scare factor, and what it adds to the formula is a far-out final twist in the revelation of a villain who … |
||||||
Whereas the original “Scream” was a genre-revitalizing shot to the arm, the more flawed “Scream 2” was no great shakes, and with “Scream 3” the franchise – soon to be updated – runs out of steam. Whereas the other films allowed viewers to laugh along with the conventional slasher scares director … |
||||||
This movie, like the series it is a part of, went on for too long. Unfortuantely for the viewing public, quality film parodies are a thing of the past, especially as long as the small group of writers who continute to churn out these films get movie deals. Oddly enough this film is a slight impro… |
||||||
|
||||||
Just another run of the mill, middle of the road, not good, not bad, mediocre slasher film. Its got a few moments that’ll appeal to slasher fans but overall it’s just an average slasher, worth a DVD rental but nothing else. Oh, and last minute of the film, with the ‘surprise ending’, was super… |
||||||
Oh my god! A crappy remake of a crappy movie gets a 4? Could I be seeing things How can this be possible? Well you’re seeing right, and yes, it is possible. My Bloody Valentine 3-D has the best part right in the title: 3-D. I don’t care what any reviewer says- the 3-D was incredible. There’s … |
ViewGuide
What To Watch
Where To Find It
Where To Find It
