Created Jan 13, 2008 05:42PM PST • Edited Jan 13, 2008 05:42PM PST
- Quality
-
OK 2.5
Pixar fan though I am, this latest installment was a disappointment. While the story picked up steam towards the end, the movie delivered no laugh-out-loud moments and little insight into the human condition illustrated by the fantastical characters, the hallmarks of great Pixar movies.
-
OK 2.5
The performances were undistinguished, with the sole exception of Peter O’Toole’s haughty critic Anton Ego.
-
Male Stars OK 2.5
-
Female Stars OK 2.5
-
Female Costars OK 2.5
-
Male Costars Very Good 3.5
Peter O’Toole, always good.
-
Good 3.0
-
Direction Very Good 3.5
-
Play Barely OK 2.0
-
Music Good 3.0
-
Visuals Great 4.0
- Content
-
Tame 1.0
-
Sex Innocent 1.0
-
Violence Gentle 1.0
-
Rudeness Polite 1.0
-
Supernatural 3.4
-
Circumstantial Supernatural 3.4
-
Biological Supernatural 3.4
-
Physical Supernatural 3.4
Jan 8, 2010 8:15PM
MJ5K
|
Well trust me, its worse than Ratatoulle. |
Nov 8, 2009 5:31PM
Wick
|
Regarding Wick’s Review |
Nov 8, 2009 1:40PM
MJ5K
|
Man, Wik, you were disapointed? This was one of my favorite Pixar films ever and one of my favorite films of 2007. If there was any Pixar movie I didn’t like, it was Cars. |
- Wick
- 66 Trust Points
- 1180 Reviews
- RSS feed
Very Good |
A movie that fits the man who made France into a triumpha... |
|
Really Great |
Formulaic sequels like *The Equalizer 3* don't get any re... |
|
Really Great |
J. Robert Oppenheimer is an American hero, flawed like mo... |
|
OK |
*Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania* is a competent Marvel... |