• Trust Weighted Barely OK
  • 15 Trust Points

On Demand

Notify
Netflix On Demand

Amazon Instant Video On Demand

$2.99 Rental

iTunes On Demand

Buy from $9.99

YouTube

Tag Tree

Genre
Vibe
Setting
Protagonists
Demographic
Occaision
Production
Period
Source
Location

Demona's Review

Created May 04, 2010 01:20PM PST • Edited May 13, 2010 04:44PM PST

  1. Quality
  2. Pretty Bad 1.5

    Whomever said that they could replace Robert Englund as Freddy… LIED!!!! The Century of Dreaded Remakes have struck AGAIN! This time, they took a classic Horror/comedy and completely made a mockery of the work and finesse that they had put into the original film.

    What will they do next?.. I don’t wanna know.. but until then, watch my WIKCHIP to find out how I really felt about the movie.

  3. Barely OK 2.0
  4. Male Stars Barely OK 2.0
  5. Female Stars Barely OK 2.0
  6. Female Costars Barely OK 2.0
  7. Male Costars Barely OK 2.0
  8. OK 2.5
  9. Direction OK 2.5
  10. Play OK 2.5
  11. Music OK 2.5
  12. Visuals OK 2.5
  13. Content
  14. Risqué 1.8
  15. Sex Titillating 1.8
  16. Violence Fierce 1.8
  17. Rudeness Salty 1.8
  18. Supernatural 4.0
  19. Circumstantial Supernatural 4.0
  20. Biological Supernatural 4.0
  21. Physical Supernatural 4.0

Forum

Subscribe to A Nightmare on Elm Street 8 replies, 5 voices
Aug 29, 2015 5:59PM
Felix

Regarding Felix’s Review
Yeah this wasn’t as bad as I thought it was going to be. It was worse.

Aug 27, 2015 7:06AM
BrianSez

Regarding Felix’s Review
Hah – yet another warning to STAY AWAY from this movie!

Jun 20, 2010 7:07PM
The Stoned H...

Regarding The Stoned Horror Critic’s Review
I never thought it was fairm to compare the two, since the Englund Freddy and the Haley Freddy are very different. Plus, I wasn’t expecting him to be better than Robert, since Robert played the dude for fucking 26 years, but I thought Haley gave a solid performance, lol. No Robert Englund, but still awesome, lol.