• Trust Weighted Good
  • 9 Trust Points

On Demand

Notify
Netflix On Demand

Amazon Instant Video On Demand

$2.99 Rental

iTunes On Demand

Rent from $3.99

YouTube

Tag Tree

Genre
Vibe
Setting
Protagonists
Demographic
Occaision
Production
Period
Source
Location

borafina's Review

Created Sep 17, 2007 10:34AM PST • Edited Sep 17, 2007 10:34AM PST

  1. Quality
  2. Good 3.0

    Corny with obvious martial arts stereotyping — Christopher Walkins made the movie for me and redeemed it back to good overall. A viewers rating may be much higher if they love table tennis, ping pong, slapstick comedy.

  3. Good 3.0

    Lots of slapstick humour. The acting was ok, nothing great. Christopher Walkins proved himself a star, especially next to what appeared to be amateur actors.

  4. Male Stars Really Great 4.5
  5. Female Stars Barely OK 2.0
  6. Female Costars Barely OK 2.0
  7. Male Costars Perfect 5.0
  8. Great 4.0

    Production components were quite fantastic. Think Bruce Lee’s Fists of Furty and pump it up with Hollywood steroids.

  9. Direction Great 4.0
  10. Play Great 4.0
  11. Music Great 4.0
  12. Visuals Great 4.0
  13. Content
  14. Tame 1.0

    Some references to it but still tame overall.

  15. Sex Innocent 1.0
  16. Violence Gentle 1.0
  17. Rudeness Polite 1.0
  18. Glib 1.8

    The idea for an international, secret ping pong championship with death being the penalty of not winning. Interesting, hopefully, highly unlikely.

  19. Circumstantial Glib 1.8
  20. Biological Glib 1.8
  21. Physical Glib 1.8

Forum

Subscribe to Balls of Fury 0 replies, 0 voices
No comments as yet.