• Trust Weighted Very Good
  • 69 Trust Points

On Demand

Notify
Netflix On Demand

Amazon Instant Video On Demand

$2.99 Rental

iTunes On Demand

Rent from $3.99

YouTube

Tag Tree

Genre
Vibe
Setting
Protagonists
Demographic
Occaision
Production
Period
Source
Location

BrettHarrison's Review

Created Mar 10, 2013 11:53AM PST • Edited Mar 10, 2013 11:53AM PST

  1. Quality
  2. Really Great 4.5

    17 years after “Citizen Kane” announced one of the great talents in cinema Orson Welles could scarcely get arrested. But after the original director got fired Welles agreed to work on the cheap and the result is a noir classic.

  3. Very Good 3.5

    Heston is totally miscast as a Mexican cop but strangely it works. There is a surreal quality to Touch of Evil and you find yourself saying “Okay, I’ll buy Chuck as a Mexican cop. Why not?” Likewise with Orson Welles Hank Quinlan, the corrupt border town cop who looks and sounds like Bluto’s less athletic brother. it’s weird but it works. But campy pleasures notwithstanding, there are some gems performance wise. Check out Marlene Dietrich who appears on screen briefly but reminds people why she was a star more than 20 years before. But it’s veteran character actor Joseph Calleia, as Hank’s assistant Pete Menzies, who has the movie’s best moments.

  4. Male Stars Very Good 3.5
  5. Female Stars Very Good 3.5
  6. Female Costars Very Good 3.5
  7. Male Costars Very Good 3.5
  8. Very Good 3.5

    The film was planned as a B movie and the budget was less than a milion dollars. It sounds like a lot for 1958 but “Ben Hur” cost more than 15 times that. So we’re not talking high production values. Yet Welles knew this could be the end of his career or a new start, depending on how he played it and made the best of it. Although Welles supposedly hated the film’s opening, which was forced on him by the studio I think Henry Mancini’s bossa nova intro helps make the opening one of the best in film history. The cinematography by Russell Metty also infuses “Touch of Evil” with so much atmosphrere you can practially feel it.

  9. Direction Very Good 3.5
  10. Play Very Good 3.5
  11. Music Very Good 3.5
  12. Visuals Very Good 3.5
  13. Content
  14. Risqué 2.5

    For 1958 there’s some pretty edgy stuff, though most of it is implied.

  15. Sex Titillating 2.5
  16. Violence Fierce 2.5

    For 1958 it’s pretty violent. The movie opens with a car bombing and ends with the main character being shot. But by today’s standards, it’s pretty tame.

  17. Rudeness Salty 2.5
  18. Glib 1.9

    “Touch of Evil” is very gritty though “real” might not quite describe it. It borders on surreal at times.

  19. Circumstantial Glib 1.9
  20. Biological Glib 1.9
  21. Physical Glib 1.9

Forum

Subscribe to Touch of Evil 1 reply, 1 voice
  • 1 - 1 of 1
  • « First
  • Last »
  • ◄ PREVIOUS
  • NEXT ►
Mar 10, 2013 1:26PM
Wick

Regarding BrettHarrison’s Review
“Orson Welles … looks and sounds like Bluto’s less athletic brother.” :-)