Created Nov 19, 2011 01:02AM PST • Edited Nov 20, 2011 07:26PM PST
- Quality
-
OK 2.5
Blade Runner meets Robin Hood In Time. If only Andrew Niccol’s sleek techno-thriller were as good as its antecedents. Well, it’s better than some Robin Hoods, but that’s a low bar.
What In Time is is quintessential Hollywood fantasy:
- No one ages beyond 25, the peak of hotness.
- Speaking of hotties, the movie’s stocked with ’em. Most are disaffected, kinda like the bored dancers in Addicted to Love back in the day.
- The rich are rich because they cheat.
- Marxist economics animate the fallacious rules driving the story.
All of which would be fine if it were more than a one-note story. Sadly it’s not.
Time is money becomes more than just a busy Tinseltown mogul’s mantra. Time really is money In Time. This singular conceit gets played for a series of increasingly lame puns that quickly lose their charm.
Nor are the attractive leads well used. Justin Timberlake & Amanda Seyfried are plenty sexy, yet limited.
Wanna know a real economic injustice in Hollywood? Wasting so many pretty faces.
Then again, fashionably Marxist Hollywood moguls get their chicks for free.
-
Good 3.0
Justin Timberlake & Amanda Seyfried – legitimate movie stars now – have a modicum of chemistry together. Pity that their cliche roles are so limiting.
Pity also that none of the supporting characters outshines them.
- Cillian Murphy makes a competent bad guy, though hardly a villain for the ages.
- Johnny Galecki fares better as an alcoholic factory worker. Nice adult role for The Big Bang Theory’s Leonard.
- Olivia Wilde is always striking, here playing Timberlake’s 50 year old Mom, living in a 25 year old body. Guess that makes her the ultimate MILF.
- Yaya DaCosta has a great name and manages to jump off screen in a bit part as a bereft woman. She did the same in The Kids Are All Right, meaning DaCosta could be a star.
- Vincent Kartheiser is passable as a heartless mogul.
Trivia note: Timberlake, Wilde, Seyfried and Kartheiser acted together in Alpha Dog, a better movie.
-
Male Stars Good 3.0
-
Female Stars Good 3.0
-
Female Costars Good 3.0
-
Male Costars OK 2.5
-
OK 2.5
The film looks cool, with a 70s retro futurism style.
-
Direction OK 2.5
-
Play Barely OK 2.0
-
Music OK 2.5
-
Visuals Very Good 3.5
Coldly retro-futuristic, stocked with de-badged E-Types, Cougars and other 60s dreamcars.
- Content
-
Risqué 2.1
-
Sex Titillating 1.9
-
Violence Fierce 1.8
-
Rudeness Profane 2.6
-
Supernatural 3.5
Justin Timberlake is 30 in real life, yet plays a perpetual 25 year old In Time.
What’s next? A remake of The Picture of Dorian Gray perhaps.
-
Circumstantial Supernatural 3.4
-
Biological Supernatural 4.0
-
Physical Supernatural 3.2
No comments as yet. |
Justin's Silver XK-E. Sleek.
Source: http://img.poptower.com/pic...
- Wick
- 66 Trust Points
- 1180 Reviews
- RSS feed
Very Good |
A movie that fits the man who made France into a triumpha... |
|
Really Great |
Formulaic sequels like *The Equalizer 3* don't get any re... |
|
Really Great |
J. Robert Oppenheimer is an American hero, flawed like mo... |
|
OK |
*Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania* is a competent Marvel... |